“You’re
gonna need a bigger boat!” Actor Roy Scheider’s ad-libbed advice in the 1975 film
Jaws came when its human protagonists
first saw the size of the shark they were up against.
I
waited till the end of the summer of its release before seeing the movie; I
didn’t want to be afraid to go to the beach! That August I watched it in a
crowded Philadelphia theater with two friends, both Roman Catholic priests.
When a severed head popped into view through a gash in the underwater hull of a
boat, one of my friends let out a scream that sent waves of screams and shouts in
the rows in front of us and behind us. One of those behind us popped the head
of my other friend with his finger, saying, “Don’t do that, man!” I caused a similar stir when I greeted fellow
seminarians watching it in a New Haven theater a few weeks later: they leapt in
their seats.
Perversely,
perhaps, I thought of this as I finished reading Julian of Norwich’s mystical
writings. Her God is so much bigger than most, with a love that preexisted all
that is loved and flows to all eternity. No wonder she approaches her visions
with “reverent fear,” what we might call “awe.”
“You’re
gonna need a bigger God!”
My
big “ah-hah,” my own revelation as I finished contemplating Julian’s Revelations is that we cannot know God.
The whole of the Bible and church tradition is but a glimpse or glimmer or even
a shadow of divinity. Using pronouns and metaphors or equating God with Jesus
limits our ability to recognize our profound ignorance.
“Duh,”
you might say, “But of course!” I might have said exactly that had I not felt
our unknowing so deeply.
Paradoxically,
that’s what the Bible is all about: our infinitesimal, limited view of God.
Jacob
wrestling with the mysterious Stranger. Sarah laughing at her Guest’s promise
of a child. The Voice from the burning bush, refusing to be named, declaring “I
will be what I will be.”
On
Mt. Sinai, Yahweh holding a hand over Moses’s eyes while passing by, with Moses
glimpsing only the afterglow. Elijah hearing simply “the sound of a gentle
stillness” or “a still, small voice.”
The
Dove at Jesus’ baptism. Jesus proclaiming an invisible Reign of God through homely,
puzzling parables and countercultural beatitudes and teachings. The enigmatic Cross.
Jesus’ Easter message to Mary, “Do not hold on to me.” Seeing in a mirror
dimly.
How,
then, can we know, in the words of 1 John, that “God is love”?
It
really is a matter of faith to affirm cosmic or divine benevolence. Yet life
and love, pleasure and joy, wisdom and compassion have come to be, surely clues
to the yearning of the universe or of divinity. Small wonder that Julian
concludes that our part is “thanking, trusting, rejoicing,” three dimensions of
a contemplative life.
Earlier
that week I had read an article about the science of all this that pointed out:
If a number called alpha, which governs the strength of electromagnetism, were infinitesimally larger or smaller, stars could not have formed, leaving a lifeless void. … Other values, like the mass of the Higgs [boson], or the strength of the force that binds together the cores of atoms, appear to be just as finely tuned. Bump the dials just barely, and nothing like our universe could exist.
If
that doesn’t give rise to reverent fear, doesn’t send you to your knees or to a
house of worship, I’m not sure what will.
My June sermon for New
York’s Fort Washington Collegiate Church is now available at this link: “When God’s Will and Human Will Coincide.”
Subscriptions are free and this site is
not “monetized” with distracting ads. Your tax-deductible contributions are its
only means of support.
Or send checks or money orders made out
to “MCC,” designating “Progressive Christian Reflections” in the memo area to:
P.O. Box 50488
Sarasota FL 34232 USA
Thank
you!
thanks, man.
ReplyDeleteWell there's 5 minutes of my life I'll never get back. A lot to do about nothing. I mean really, because you're talking about a god that has basically zero evidence that it exists, and yet you filled the page of a blog about what it might be like if it existed. A child could do the same about their imaginary friend. The fact that the cosmological constants Seem to be so finely tuned that if tweeked would not create the universe we live in now, just means that if they were different, the universe that it would make would be different, and we wouldn't be here to ponder its existence. Just like evolution, creatures Seem to be designed for the environment in which they live, when actually creatures evolve to fit their environment, not the other way around; similarly, if the cosmological constants created a different environment in the universe, something other than what exists in it now would be the norm.
ReplyDeleteIt's human hubris to think that God designed the Universe to suit our existence.